“For, notwithstanding the great love which the converts to these different faiths expressed at the time of their conversion, and the great zeal manifested by the respective clergy, who were active in getting up and promoting this extraordinary scene of religious feeling, in order to have everybody converted, as they were pleased to call it, let them join what sect they pleased; yet when the converts began to file off, some to one party and some to another, it was seen that the seemingly good feelings of both the priests and the converts were more pretended than real; for a scene of great confusion and bad feeling ensued—priest contending against priest, and convert against convert; so that all their good feelings one for another, if they ever had any, were entirely lost in a strife of words and a contest about opinions.” — Joseph Smith—History 1:6
The Prophet Joseph Smith offers a striking reflection on religious zeal and human behaviour, particularly in times of religious fervour and revival. He described the fervent religious atmosphere of the early 19th-century “Second Great Awakening,” where multiple Christian denominations vied for converts. While the initial excitement and expressions of love and unity appeared genuine, they quickly disintegrated into contention and division once individuals began choosing sides and aligning with different sects.
Smith was pointing out the fact that unity built on mere enthusiasm or emotional fervour is fragile. When human pride, competition, or the desire to be right becomes the driving force, even religious movements can fall into contention. This reminds me of the Apostle Paul’s teaching in 1 Corinthians 13:1-3, where he emphasizes that without love (charity), even great works are empty. Joseph’s observation warns us of the danger of superficial unity that lacks the deeper foundation of humility and genuine Christlike love.
Contention, even among sincere believers, can undermine the true purpose of faith. The Saviour taught in 3 Nephi 11:29 that contention is of the devil and that His doctrine is one of peace and unity. We need to be cautious when discussions about doctrine turn into arguments rather than opportunities for mutual edification. The strife the Prophet witnessed reflects human tendencies toward division when pride and self-righteousness overshadow Christ’s call to love one another.
The quote about contention raises the question of authenticity in religious conversion and devotion. Were the expressions of love and unity truly rooted in a deep, abiding faith in Jesus Christ, or were they driven by social pressure and emotionalism? True discipleship calls for enduring conversion and love that transcends differences, rather than shallow feelings that crumble in the face of disagreement.
For me, the first quote serves is a reminder to examine the motives behind my own religious zeal and to seek a faith that is genuine, patient, and centred on Christ. It encourages a commitment to charity even when doctrinal disagreements arise, remembering that love—not mere agreement—is the highest commandment. It also speaks to the importance of unity within the body of Christ, where diverse perspectives should be approached with humility and mutual respect rather than competition or contention. I must ask myself: 1) Are my expressions of faith driven by a true love of Heavenly Father and others, or are they influenced by pride or a desire to be right? 2) How can I foster deeper unity and understanding among those with differing beliefs while remaining true to my own convictions? 3) What steps can I take to ensure my own religious devotion is more than emotional enthusiasm, but rather rooted in lasting, Christlike charity?
Joseph Smith’s reflections on the religious contention of his time highlight a truth that remains relevant today—the danger of zeal devoid of genuine charity. His recounting of early experiences reveals the unfortunate outcome of rivalry among religious sects—where love quickly gave way to strife as religious leaders and converts contended against one another. It is a strong warning that human pride, when masked by religious fervour, can breed division rather than peace.
This theme finds a counterpoint in two powerful statements from Joseph’s later ministry. In a discourse given on July 9, 1843, Joseph declared:
“I am just as ready to die in defending the rights of a Presbyterian, a Baptist or a good man of any other denomination; for the same principle which would trample upon the rights of the Latter-day Saints would trample upon the rights of the Roman Catholics, or of any other denomination who may be unpopular.”
Similarly, the Ordinance in Relation to Religious Societies passed by the Nauvoo City Council in 1841 enshrined religious liberty for all:
“Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Nauvoo, that the Catholics, Presbyterians, Methodists, Baptists, Latter-day Saints, Quakers, Episcopal[ians]s, Universalists, Unitarians, Mohammedans [Muslims], and all other religious sects and denominations whatever, shall have free toleration, and equal privileges in this city.”
These sentiments reveal the Prophet’s commitment to a broader principle of unity, respect, and religious freedom that transcended sectarian lines. They build upon the lessons he learned from the chaos of religious contention, turning the pain of that experience into a lifelong advocacy for tolerance. I believe that Joseph’s defence of religious freedom for all—not just his own faith community—reflects a Christlike charity rooted in the Golden Rule: “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the Law and the Prophets” (Matthew 7:12). This challenges us to ask whether our own religious zeal is accompanied by a respect for the rights and dignity of those who might believe differently.
Joseph’s willingness to die for the rights of others demonstrates a deep understanding that freedom of religion must apply equally to all. This is a vital principle in a world where religious minorities still face persecution. The Prophet’s words are a reminder that defending the rights of one group secures liberty for all. Contention about doctrinal differences often stems from the same pride Joseph observed in his youth. However, ordinances like that of Nauvoo reflect a better way—a community where respect for diversity is codified into law. True unity does not require uniformity but rather mutual respect and shared commitment to love and truth.
I ask myself: 1) Do I extend true charity to those of other faiths, honouring their right to believe and worship according to their conscience? 2) How can I contribute to fostering greater understanding and peace among those with differing views, rather than contention? 3) Am I willing to defend the freedoms of those whose beliefs differ from my own, recognizing that the fight for their rights also upholds my own?
As Latter-day Saints, we must embody a faith that is not merely emotional zeal but a steady, Christlike love that seeks to unify rather than divide. It is our duty to defend the sacred right of religious liberty, not just for ourselves but for all people, in the spirit of justice and peace.
When I reflect on these teachings and experiences, I am reminded of how life changing true charity and respect for religious freedom can be in our lives. There was a time when I felt frustrated or defensive when encountering people of other faiths with beliefs that differed from my own. It was easy to feel the pull of pride—wanting to prove a point or assert my views as superior. But through deeper study of the Scriptures and reflection on the examples of Christ and Joseph Smith, I have learned a better way. One of the most significant lessons I have embraced is that truth and love walk hand in hand. Contention never convinces, but kindness and sincere respect often open doors that an argument cannot. I have seen friendships grow and my understanding deepen when I have taken the time to listen, honour others’ journeys, and recognise that God works in many lives in ways beyond my comprehension.
Joseph Smith’s willingness to defend the rights of people from all denominations inspires me deeply. He understood that religious liberty is a sacred right belonging to all, not just his own community. I have felt the Spirit testify that defending others’ freedoms strengthens my faith and commitment to Christ. However, I have also learned that tolerance and respect for other religions does not mean I accept their beliefs as my own. I can honour others’ freedom to believe and worship as they choose while remaining steadfast in my personal convictions. Respecting someone’s path does not require abandoning the truth I hold dear, but rather, it affirms the love and humility that Christ calls us to embody.
I testify that when we approach others with charity and defend their right to worship, we reflect the Saviour’s love. Tolerance built on love and truth promotes peace and unity without compromising personal faith. I know that Heavenly Father’s love encompasses all who seek Him and that we are called to build bridges, not walls, to extend His love to all people. This brings true joy, deeper understanding, and the beauty of Christian fellowship.
